ISIS Vehicles Being Hunted By Russian Mi-28 Helicopters In Eastern Homs, Syria

SHARE on FB, Twitter, Instagram, G+ - ISIS Vehicles Being Hunted By Russian Mi-28 Helicopters In Eastern Homs

Subscribe to Military Tiger - MilitaryTiger

After Russian President Vladimir Putin decided to assist his friend in Syria, President Bashar al-assad, the scenario of the Syrian Civil War changed. By sending Russian Air Force and then Russian Special Operations Forces to Syrian soil to fight deadly terrorism of ISIS/Daesh it changes the faces of the war forever. Russian Air Force's continuous bombing on ISIS positions created devastating situations and forced those inhumane terrorists to pull back! Putin's intervention into Syrian war significantly reduced Daesh's mass killing of innocent civilians across Syria and Iraqi territories this terrorist group captured.

Firslty Russians cleared forward areas those were in ISIS capture and then compelled them to pull back. While Syrian Arab Army holds some ground Russia intensified the air strikes which created havocs for ISIS! They broke the supply chain of ISIS, curtail arms supply and finally made them to gather in holes that Russian fighter jets and Spec Ops Force Spetsnaz along with SyAA can smash these terrorists group forever.

However, most of the western leaders and mainstream media made, and still, crocodiles' tears by shouting that Russians targeting innocent civilians who're not supporting Bashar al-Assad. Kremlin didn't hear it but, proved it that CIA-Mossad-Saudi nexus created and keep alive ISIS and oither Syrian terrorists groups to topple Assad. In fact, Turkey was dealing it with great eagerness to see Assad ousted and handling the whole matter from behind the curtain.

Although, whose are behind ISIS, it's now smashed to death! Definitely credits goes to Putin's Russia! Toppling plan for Assad is now dead but very recently Saudi Foreign Minister al-Jubeir said that Plan-B to oust Assad will be implemented! To whom he threw the threat, we all know! We must wait and see what happens next!

                                             ♥ Follow us on ♥

                           https://www.facebook.com/MilitaryTiger
                           https://www.twitter.com/Military_Tiger
                           https://www.instagram.com/military_tiger
                           https://www.pinterest.com/militarytiger/
                           https://www.google.com/+MilitaryTiger

                          
                                   ○○○ Stay Tuned and Enjoy ○○○

UK Used Brimstone Missiles First Time In Syria

Royal Air Force used Brimstone missiles for the first time in Syria to strike against Daesh. Four attck was carried out by RAF combat jets deployed in the Middle East to fight against Daesh/ISIS/ISIL. Two of the strikes near Raqqa, targeted a vehicle and in the Omar oilfield in the eastern Syria, media reports. Two Tornado jets used a Brimstone missile to destroy a supply truck near Raqqa, and Paveway IV laser-guided bombs to target two IS buildings, including a command and control center. Another two Tornados and a Reaper drone used three Brimstones, as well as Hellfire missiles, to attack a number of mobile cranes brought in by IS to the Omar oilfield to try to repair damage inflicted by previous air strikes.

An MBDA Brimstone II missile 

Brimstone missiles are radar-guided and can be used against moving targets. The RAF has carried out several strikes in Syria since MPs voted in favour of extending UK action into the country on 2 December. The UK and Saudi Arabia are the only two countries to have purchased Brimstones.

Are Turkey and Saudi Arabia Going to be Busted!?

King Salman and Turkish President Erdogan are about to spark a new war for control over Middle Eastern oil but the plan, which was in fact devised by Washington, will ultimately backfire, F. William Engdahl asserted. Riyadh, assisted by Qatar and Turkey, is striving to bring oil fields and pipeline routes in Iraq and neighboring Syria "under direct Saudi control," the expert on oil politics noted. "Unfortunately, as in all wars, there will be no winners," Engdahl wrote in an opinion piece for New Eastern Outlook. He also named the EU, the Iraqis, Syrians and Kurds as the main losers. 

The historian named four key groupings, which will be involved in the upcoming conflict. Sunnis, including Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Daesh and the recently formed Saudi-led anti-terrorist coalition, make up the first group. The second one consists of Syria, Iran, Iraq and Hezbollah, with Russia also being a factor. The analyst named Israel as the third player. Engdahl maintains that the fourth group, led by the United States, is "playing the most sly, deceptive role" at the moment.

"Washington is preparing a devastating trap that will catch the foolish Saudis and their Turkish and other Wahhabi allies in a devastating defeat in Syria and Iraq that will no doubt then be proclaimed as a 'victory over terrorism' and a 'victory for the Syrian people,'" the historian assumed.

Daesh, according to Engdahl, is instrumental to the Saudi plan. The oil kingdom wants the group to perform "ethnic cleansing of the legitimate Syrian populations" living in oil-rich regions so that it would then be able to transport fuel from Qatar and Saudi Arabia to Turkey through Syria. "Erdogan's Turkish military and most especially his Turkish intelligence, MIT, headed by close crony, Hakan Fidan, is playing a key role in the planned Saudi-Turk-Qatari coalition's move to destroy the regime of Assad and at the same time seize control for them of the rich oil fields of Iraq between Mosul and Kirkuk," the historian explained.

Although many see the recently-adopted UN Security Council resolution on Syria as an achievement that will help to bring lasting peace to Syria, Engdahl views the document as a "a near-perfect deceptive maneuver" designed by Washington to "set the stage for the imminent Saudi-Turk oil wars and subsequent debacle in Syria and Iraq." The agreement paves the way for a ceasefire, which is expected to be followed by the UN-supervised free and fair presidential election. "That ceasefire excludes Saudi and Turkey-backed Daesh, and the al-Qaeda affiliate, al-Nusra Front. At the same time, it calls for an immediate, simultaneous start of a 'political transition' which means completely contradictory things for the United States, Germany, France and the UK as it does for Syria, Iran, and Russia," Engdahl warned.

The expert maintains that Russia, Damascus-led forces, Hezbollah and Iran will abide by the resolution, while Daesh and the like will "have free reign to grab the oil riches" in Iraq and Syria. "At that point, the trap will have been set and Washington will no doubt spring it, with Russia, Iran and Assad … able to do little to prevent it," he observed.

Questions Which Tangled The Concerns Over Saudi's Proposal To Pakistan For Joining In Yemen Attack

1: Currently FATA, LOC, Indian border, Afghanistan border, Karachi, Siachen & Khuzdar are active fronts which have stretched Pakistan military's capabilities, leading for them to make immense changes in conventional force posture. If the Parliament does approve the deployment of Pakistan Army into either Saudi Arabia or Yemen, it would leave Pakistan Army even more stretched with its resources and manpower. If Pakistan is going to fulfill a capability gap for the Saudi military forces, who will fulfill the gap left by the deployment of Pakistan Army inside Pakistan's own low intensity conflict zones?

Outcome of Saudi Invasion on Yemen: 

2: Would Saudi Arabia and its allies be willing to make a token military contribution to Pakistan's conventional defenses should another war with India breakout?

3: What guarantee there is that India won't take advantage of the Pakistani deployment to the Middle East by being assertive on the border or by teaming up with Iran and Afghanistan to isolate Pakistan as it has always wanted to?

4: What contingency plan does the govt have if such a deployment fuels further sectarianism in Pakistan?

5: What would the govt do if Iran who would be unhappy about such a deployment reactivates its own proxies inside Pakistan to create a situation right here in order to make Pakistan 'pay' for it?

Two non-democratic power grabber. 

6: Why would the govt not specify, in the light of Pakistani national interests what exactly are the objectives for which they want to join this coalition?

7: Why Al-Qaeda in Arabian Peninsula and Daesh haven't yet been targeted in Yemen by the coalition airstrikes?